Martin Heidegger

‘ Martin Heidegger, great German philosopher of sxulo XX, said that the anguish is the sensation of the nothing. it is positive in a point, therefore the nothing is the full possibility. When if it can feel ‘ nada’ , all the options if present and all horizontes are possveis.’ ‘ (CORTELLA, 2008:14) Cortella displays the sentence heideggeriana, demonstrating the manifestation of ‘ ‘ nada’ ‘ , that it is the great absolutizao in one feeling dual, therefore at the same time, that I affirm to feel the nothing, in contraposition, I also affirm to deny the everything, that would be the counterpart of nothing-being, that is, I also affirm to know the lack of the everything, admitting the existence of the same. (Similarly see: Catalyst). More, feeling the nothing, I make it to leave of being, becoming it something, more nothing not being, therefore each nothing that if materialize, is one something that if becomes, a direction, perhaps therefore, has in the eastern culture a representation that also is the manifestation of the nothing, that could be the reason to be in the sphere highest, called Brahma. Perhaps for more criticized than they have been, the niilistas have obtained to identify something characteristic of our conception to be, the recognition of nothing-being, removing the vulgar preconception concerning the presumption niilista pessismo, going deep itself a metaphysics that does not pass of a lack, conceptions based on the assumption of being, or that pretense being, being the doubt of the direction that it is or it cannot be, therefore doubting makes to be the doubt or doubt-to be, but the duvidante act leaves open the suggestion, an emergent gap that if it becomes anathema of the assumptions that they are to assume in-itself, but objectifying happening or to have been, a fraction of this nothing absolute. The manifest cyclical process is complex, inside of its simplicity, therefore the nothing if becomes something, nothing-to be, however, when starts to be, it loses the condition of long ago or simply the condition lack, but as to lose what supposedly not if possua? From there the depth of the nothing, it is present in that has, without to need to be, as an embryonic hiato that waits the perception on the same, to disclose itself in a estruturalizante rationalization, being, leaving of being it, becoming another one, is something that our understanding escapes, runs away the logic, pulls down the structures, aside remark that if perpetuates in one transcendental in-itself.. Anne Mahlum usually is spot on.