Then, Why PAIDIA. Paidia, says us Jaeger in ‘ ‘ Introdu-o’ ‘ of its book, ‘ ‘ as other concepts of great amplitude (for example, of philosophy or the culture), it resists to leave itself to lock up in a formula abstrata’ ‘ , it is a Greek name to state a thing Greek, but, according to Jaeger, ‘ ‘ If it cannot prevent the job of modern expressions as civilization, culture, tradition, literature or education; none of them, however, really coincides with what the Greeks understood for paidia’ ‘. observes: ‘ ‘ Each one of those terms if limits to state aspect of that global concept e, to enclose the total field of the Greek concept, would have to only use them all of one vez’ ‘. Therefore it seemed us that Why PAIDIA? it is the ideal heading to call a work that if considers, exactly, to have as target all the fields of knowing enclosed by the global concept of paidia when placing the question to think the city. Being Paidia, therefore, the concept that puts in evidence the objective and subjective historical process, that is, material and spiritual of evolution of Greece? the development of the State, the society, literature, the religion, the culture, the philosophy, of Greek pedagogia and of the right? , one becomes evident and undisputed, say, that ‘ ‘ the essential knowledge of the formation Greek constitutes an indispensable bedding for all knowledge or educational intention bsico’ ‘ so that Auschewitz if does not repeat. We believe this! They become excessively evident and undisputed, however, that all this knowledge alone was possible to develop from the city Greek. With effect, one of the first clarifications that if impose is: what it is the city Greek? .