Diversity Management

Indeed, an outline of everything that in my opinion can adversely affect the functioning of a court, allowed me to locate as such the following: Problem in: That affects: Accessibility to the service efficiency (speed) Independence Organization Wrong r workload distribution of attitude of indifference by public servants obsolete or dysfunctional IT Infrastructure restricted hours and working hours coincide with the general lack of rigorous follow-up the handling of promotions received. Lack of planning Lack of scrutiny or review continued and effective work carried out by supervisory bodies Lack of personal identity between the Resistance to the optimal use of computing resources Lack of institutional conviction irregular shape of arriving at the a of the judiciary Lack of supervision by higher organs Linking insecurity in office to other agencies or persons. r Procedure Absence of a flowchart to serve as a model in the lack of control procedures performed and classification of information Lack of control of the records relating to deficiency judgments on the ways and means of procedural information to the parties within the trials hold paradigms obsolete or nonfunctional in the procedures applied during the performance.

Lack of security mechanisms and control procedures Staff resistance to change is understood as a process redesign Failure, on the term prescribed by law, the issuance of resolutions and practice of process Lack of follow-up trials during their education or integration procedural criteria to Diversity Management efficiencies D building facilities and deficiencies in the mechanisms of information to the general public about the roles and activities for the body Lack of material resources Lack of expertise of staff missing Lack of human resources job description key personnel of the courts lack of refresher training in the headline of the court Ineffective maintenance of equipment and lack of updating systems and training in the headline of the court on the other hand, in terms of criterion as subjectively defined by the need to manage an organization about it, though an expected result, took the form strongly suggests the corollary of a survey carried together with a peer group within the jurisdiction in which they work, in the then establish the most feasible measures to implement, the less cared for, those who hurt us but not serve them and those that generate the greatest benefit to their care, as major issues to be considered by the holder of a particular organism, we obtained the following: Survey : Attended the importance ndo, in your concept, have the following, if you were head of the court, I n what order each would attend?

Appearance: Decision to eradicate polio: Measures most likely to implement aspects underserved 25 n 50 r Those who do not attend to hurt us more than 80 Those who generate the greatest benefit to attend to that exposed 45 Ooutcome be seen graphically as follows: Personally I think it would be very convenient and why not say it illustrates the power establish sustainable foundations, from the efficiency, effectiveness and efficiency, what else should take account of the holder of a court understood as an organization to establish its administrative strategy within the same To this end, should, first ascertain the meaning of those words, which in concrete terms is as follows: Effectiveness far as the objectives or goals of action produced the desired effect or desired..